"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:UaCdnXWPSLwRzxfVnZ2dnUVZ_qninZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a43a4$0$20537$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:EfudnTe0ycBXuxfVnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48899e6f$0$20521$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in message news:QOSdnWFHfoeb4xTVnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48893b7f$0$20502$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote in

snipped 5 sets of headers

for "brevity"

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours,
anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't
think so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me
here, that were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you
she has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where
did I make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my
claims.


so do it for once,

I already did, as usual, and, you already snipped part of it (for
"brevity", like anyone gives a shit).

It is always a case of "I did it before ( cough cough bullshit ) but
can't reproduce it.

"Reproduced" (15 times or so, this time) below, for the third post.

I always reproduce it.

15 times well done I am glad you can cut and paste, only one problem :-
where does it say this person predates you.

In the 15 times.

Comprehension is a serious problem for you isn't it?

Not me.

I already -know- when I started posting here.

good on you


You're the one that can't poor piss out of a boot.

I don't have the dribble problem that you obviously have, get your prostate
checked


Everybody else in the thread either knows about when I started posting,
or could easily find out.

You're the only one here that can't figure out whether I'm an early or
original poster.

Only because I don't care


See, when you first posted your lie, I went and checked on who it might
be, checked when they started posting, and if they left.

so have you figured out who it was


I did it for several people, in just a few minutes.

You can't do it for even one, in two days.

mainly because I don't care, you are mistaking me for someone who cares
about your ranting and raving because your comprehension skills let you down
AGAIn


It's because you're STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

The very funniest part is that -anyone- here that you could name off the
top of your head could help you.

And no one does, because that's the regard in which you are held here.
;-)

So, per your team SOP, you cut and snip and deny and slather counter
accusations.

And it doesn't fool anyone, except, I guess, Greg Mossman.

He doesn't have any problem with your lies, bombast and flummery.

No lies

even though you have cut and pasted numerous times you don't understand
what you have posted. Lets have a look at what you have pasted so many
times
" the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" nowhere in these words is there a mention that this person
predates you on this ng.

That sentance -specifically states- she predates me on the ng.

Crap as I don't know and don't care when you first posted. This is starting
to show severe paranoia on your part. It was a comment not an attack on when
you started posting to this ng. You are far to sensitive.

snip the Popeye bluster, rants and as hominem attacks


Shit Popeye, you better sit down, I gon't know if he missed the d or

On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:9bSdnTVBveG2ExfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a84e0$0$20503$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
snip


Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to
a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

You have evidence that this is a lie? You are going to prove that
"everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume". Good luck this should be interesting

The usual context snip.

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:39:45 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:H-mdnYu2V5AtjRTVnZ2dnUVZ_q3inZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888f4eb$0$20524$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in
message news:d6WdncHJV8cKxhXVnZ2dnUVZ_ovinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888555b$0$20517$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote
in message news:K6-dna2HYtOR1RXVnZ2dnUVZ_jKdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4888301d$0$20505$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote in message
news:zK2dnaiYHYrTJhrVnZ2dnUVZ_sDinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48879b82$0$20525$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours, anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't think so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me here,
that
were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated you she
has
taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where did I
make
this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my claims.


so do it for once, stop posting about it and just do it. Come on back up
your allegations it can't be to hard this thread isn't that long.

You certainly haven't back up your claim in your ad hominem rant below
that
for the sake of brevity I have snipped



To my knowledge he has done it many times

"Rod" <log_dog at (no spam) verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:488ba394.206820109 at (no spam) news.verizon.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:9bSdnTVBveG2ExfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a84e0$0$20503$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
snip


Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name
to a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

You have evidence that this is a lie? You are going to prove that
"everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume". Good luck this should be
interesting

The usual context snip.

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

try and keep up this discussion between myself and Popeye, now, is around
his claim that I claimed this person "predated him". I made no such claim
which is understandable as I have no idea when he started posting. Popeye
keeps claiming he has posted "evidence" that I did but like all of Popeyes
evidence it seems to be rather lacking in relevence

On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:05:52 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:UaCdnXWPSLwRzxfVnZ2dnUVZ_qninZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a43a4$0$20537$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in
message news:EfudnTe0ycBXuxfVnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48899e6f$0$20521$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote
in message news:QOSdnWFHfoeb4xTVnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:48893b7f$0$20502$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com
wrote in

snipped 5 sets of headers

for "brevity"

What's the name of this "original" poster of yours,
anyway?

Let me guess- you forgot to ask?

no I didn't and a lovely lady she was to

Ah.

SOSAD.

So sad that I met a nice septic lady who dives? I don't
think so.

No, STUPID Dave, "Same old song and dance".

There are no "original" women contributors who predate me
here, that were here while I was, except -maybe- one.

who said she predated you? I'm know she wouldn't have dated
you
she has taste

You did, STUPID.

really? I know this is going to be difficult for you but where
did I make this claim?

It's never difficult for me to quickly and easily prove my
claims.


so do it for once,

I already did, as usual, and, you already snipped part of it (for
"brevity", like anyone gives a shit).

It is always a case of "I did it before ( cough cough bullshit )
but
can't reproduce it.

"Reproduced" (15 times or so, this time) below, for the third post.

I always reproduce it.

15 times well done I am glad you can cut and paste, only one problem
:-
where does it say this person predates you.

In the 15 times.

Comprehension is a serious problem for you isn't it?

Not me.

I already -know- when I started posting here.

good on you


You're the one that can't poor piss out of a boot.

I don't have the dribble problem that you obviously have, get your
prostate
checked


Everybody else in the thread either knows about when I started posting,
or could easily find out.

You're the only one here that can't figure out whether I'm an early or
original poster.

Only because I don't care


See, when you first posted your lie, I went and checked on who it might
be, checked when they started posting, and if they left.

so have you figured out who it was


I did it for several people, in just a few minutes.

You can't do it for even one, in two days.

mainly because I don't care, you are mistaking me for someone who cares
about your ranting and raving because your comprehension skills let you
down
AGAIn


It's because you're STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

The very funniest part is that -anyone- here that you could name off
the
top of your head could help you.

And no one does, because that's the regard in which you are held here.
;-)

So, per your team SOP, you cut and snip and deny and slather counter
accusations.

And it doesn't fool anyone, except, I guess, Greg Mossman.

He doesn't have any problem with your lies, bombast and flummery.

No lies

even though you have cut and pasted numerous times you don't understand
what you have posted. Lets have a look at what you have pasted so many
times
" the person in question said she was an original/early contributor to
this ng" nowhere in these words is there a mention that this person
predates you on this ng.

That sentance -specifically states- she predates me on the ng.

Crap as I don't know and don't care when you first posted. This is
starting
to show severe paranoia on your part. It was a comment not an attack on
when
you started posting to this ng. You are far to sensitive.

snip the Popeye bluster, rants and as hominem attacks


Shit Popeye, you better sit down, I gon't know if he missed the d or
forgot the second s ,, he may be going for a flank attack

On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:9bSdnTVBveG2ExfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a84e0$0$20503$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
snip


Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to
a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

You have evidence that this is a lie? You are going to prove that
"everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume". Good luck this should be interesting

The usual context snip.

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488ba80d$0$8931$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Rod" <log_dog at (no spam) verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:488ba394.206820109 at (no spam) news.verizon.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in
message news:9bSdnTVBveG2ExfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a84e0$0$20503$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
snip


Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name
to a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

You have evidence that this is a lie? You are going to prove that
"everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume". Good luck this should be
interesting

The usual context snip.

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are
you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

try and keep up this discussion between myself and Popeye, now, is around
his claim that I claimed this person "predated him". I made no such claim
which is understandable as I have no idea when he started posting. Popeye
keeps claiming he has posted "evidence" that I did but like all of
Popeyes evidence it seems to be rather lacking in relevence


Both of those statements are clearly documented lies.

He -does- seem to be latent about the mansex thing.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:4budnVY-PtIyJxbVnZ2dnUVZ_v3inZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488ba80d$0$8931$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Rod" <log_dog at (no spam) verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:488ba394.206820109 at (no spam) news.verizon.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in
message news:9bSdnTVBveG2ExfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a84e0$0$20503$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
snip


Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name
to a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

You have evidence that this is a lie? You are going to prove that
"everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume". Good luck this should be
interesting

The usual context snip.

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are
you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

try and keep up this discussion between myself and Popeye, now, is
around his claim that I claimed this person "predated him". I made no
such claim which is understandable as I have no idea when he started
posting. Popeye keeps claiming he has posted "evidence" that I did but
like all of Popeyes evidence it seems to be rather lacking in relevence


Both of those statements are clearly documented lies.

so document them if it is so clear.

"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488bbaf2$0$8973$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:4budnVY-PtIyJxbVnZ2dnUVZ_v3inZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488ba80d$0$8931$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...

"Rod" <log_dog at (no spam) verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:488ba394.206820109 at (no spam) news.verizon.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote
in
message news:9bSdnTVBveG2ExfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a84e0$0$20503$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
snip


Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's
name to a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

You have evidence that this is a lie? You are going to prove that
"everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume". Good luck this should be
interesting

The usual context snip.

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are
you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

try and keep up this discussion between myself and Popeye, now, is
around his claim that I claimed this person "predated him". I made no
such claim which is understandable as I have no idea when he started
posting. Popeye keeps claiming he has posted "evidence" that I did but
like all of Popeyes evidence it seems to be rather lacking in relevence


Both of those statements are clearly documented lies.

so document them if it is so clear.

I already did.

"Rod" <log_dog at (no spam) verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:488ba394.206820109 at (no spam) news.verizon.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:9bSdnTVBveG2ExfVnZ2dnUVZ_hjinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"dechucka" <dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote in message
news:488a84e0$0$20503$5a62ac22 at (no spam) per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
snip


Unlike you not everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name
to a
ng if they are using a nom de plume

LIES, LIES, LIES.

STUPID, STUPID, STUPID.

You have evidence that this is a lie? You are going to prove that
"everybody is so crass as you to post someone's name to a ng
if they are using a nom de plume". Good luck this should be
interesting

The usual context snip.

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck



Holy Sweet Jesus.

That's gotta be the worst cut of the century so far.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:nsSdnWFaIeVXIxbVnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"Rod" <log_dog at (no spam) verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:488ba394.206820109 at (no spam) news.verizon.net...
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:06:02 +1000, "dechucka"
dechucka at (no spam) vomithotmail.com> wrote:


snip
sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.


Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck



Holy Sweet Jesus.

That's gotta be the worst cut of the century so far.

do you have any idea what you are crapping on about?

Uhmmm....ok...I'll give it a shot.

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:nsSdnWFaIeVXIxbVnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...
"Rod" <log_dog at (no spam) verizonnet.addthedot> wrote in message
news:488ba394.206820109 at (no spam) news.verizon.net...

sorry you made a statement of fact and I asked you to back it up. Are
you
going to back it up or wimp off in your normal ranting, raving.
pontificating crap way . My money is on the latter.

Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

Holy Sweet Jesus.

That's gotta be the worst cut of the century so far.

do you have any idea what you are crapping on about?

"Douglas W. "Popeye" Frederick" <Popeye at (no spam) finalprotectivefire.com> wrote in
message news:QoSdnVLwSqjIIhbVnZ2dnUVZ_qvinZ2d at (no spam) supernews.com...

Dumb fuck, how can Doug prove that your invisable woman doesn't exist
when you can't prove she does ? The burdon is on you, lets hope she
isn't a picture of a truck

try and keep up this discussion between myself and Popeye, now, is
around his claim that I claimed this person "predated him". I made no
such claim which is understandable as I have no idea when he started
posting. Popeye keeps claiming he has posted "evidence" that I did but
like all of Popeyes evidence it seems to be rather lacking in
relevence


Both of those statements are clearly documented lies.

so document them if it is so clear.

I already did.

was that your 15 pastes of irrelevant crap?