Main Page | Report this Page
 
   
Hobby Forum Index  »  Martial Arts  »  OT - Brown Pushes Peak While Arabs Terraform...
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
Greendistantstar...
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:51 pm
Guest
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jun/23/oil.saudiarabia

"Gordon Brown clashed with leading oil-producing nations yesterday,
insisting that surging demand from the developing world rather than
speculative pressures was driving up oil prices and creating an oil crisis
to match those of the 1970s.

Brown had flown to Jeddah to attend a one-day oil summit of producers and
consumers convened by Saudi Arabia, saying it was the duty of world leaders
to address the biggest crisis facing the world.

In his speech, Brown offered a long-term deal whereby the oil-consuming
nations would diversify energy supplies, moving into nuclear and renewables,
and the oil-producing countries would increase production, as well as
recycle some of their huge profits into western renewable technologies.
Brown has stated that oil producers have earned $3tn in extra profits from
the latest oil shock. He also revealed Britain will host a follow-up summit
in London, to build the shared analysis of what he described as the biggest
problem of the world."

And what are the Arab oil producing nations doing with those extra dollars
squeezed out of our wallets at the bowser?

Building mega-structures such as The World, Palm Jumeirah, Palm Jebel Ali
and Palm Deira.

http://www.ameinfo.com/133896.html

And with gas at US 75c a gallon, right now, it's good to be an Arab in
Dubai.



GDS

"Let's roll!"
Scary...
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:51 pm
Guest
On Jun 23, 11:51 am, "Greendistantstar"
<pde63539removet... at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote:
Quote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jun/23/oil.saudiarabia

"Gordon Brown clashed with leading oil-producing nations yesterday,
insisting that surging demand from the developing world rather than
speculative pressures was driving up oil prices and creating an oil crisis
to match those of the 1970s.

Brown had flown to Jeddah to attend a one-day oil summit of producers and
consumers convened by Saudi Arabia, saying it was the duty of world leaders
to address the biggest crisis facing the world.

In his speech, Brown offered a long-term deal whereby the oil-consuming
nations would diversify energy supplies, moving into nuclear and renewables,
and the oil-producing countries would increase production, as well as
recycle some of their huge profits into western renewable technologies.
Brown has stated that oil producers have earned $3tn in extra profits from
the latest oil shock. He also revealed Britain will host a follow-up summit
in London, to build the shared analysis of what he described as the biggest
problem of the world."

And what are the Arab oil producing nations doing with those extra dollars
squeezed out of our wallets at the bowser?

Building mega-structures such as The World, Palm Jumeirah, Palm Jebel Ali
and Palm Deira.

http://www.ameinfo.com/133896.html

And with gas at US 75c a gallon, right now, it's good to be an Arab in
Dubai.

GDS

"Let's roll!"

And when all the oils gone, they might have something other then sand,
flies and camel shit in their backwater countries.
There’s a quote which goes “ the Persian Gulf is the asshole of the
world and Basra is 300 miles up it”, some how I don’t think anyone
wold ever want to take their holidays there unless they did a lot of
terra forming.

Scary.
travisgod at (no spam) aol.cominyrface...
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:08 pm
Guest
Quote:
The people fundinging these resorts are immensely wealthy, and will
continue to be immensely wealthy regardless of what happens, for years
to come.  They have more money than they know what to do with, and no
real reason to expect that this will not continue to be the case.
Peak to them is irrelevant; they will still be selling oil, and at
higher and higher prices, for as long as there is demand.

Good lord, you are stupid...did you miss the entire point of
capitalism and investment?

WHAT people? Tommy fucking Lee? Who are they going to sell these
villas to? Who is going to lease space in the Burj? Or the other
dozen supertall buildings?

Quote:
See, this is your problem Trav.  Your entire "expertise" on this
subject is what you Google on it.  You don't understand the industry,
or even basic economics.

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they do and don't understand,
you frickin moron?

You have no expertise in this or any other topic, so STFU and go back
to the peanut gallery. If you want to take me on on what I know about
oil or economics, I am salivating, I really am.

Still waiting for that clip of your guitar playing. I'm not going to
hold my breath.

Quote:
These folks are not going to stop selling all the oil they camp pump
for decades to come.  They might peak - they might even have peaked
already - it doesn't matter.  They're still going to sell all they can
pump, at higher and higher prices.  The only "insanity" here is you
trying to play the role of "expert" on something you barely
understand.

The only insanity here is your actually even thinking you can form
coherent sentences.

Dubai is the equivalent of Las Vegas or suburbia, you stupid fuck.
It's an investment in nothing. Why build houses on a fucking
artificial island? Nobody wants to live in Dubai. Why build gigantic
buildings with no occupants?

This is the DEFINITION of a WASTE, just like your posts on RMA.

Of course I know how these people funding these "ventures" can afford
to build these stupid, wasteful projects and that they will be rich so
long as there is oil to sell. Who the fuck DOESN'T know that? Do you
honestly think you have something new here to tell me? If you do, get
to it.

It's WASTED FUCKING MONEY, wasted "investment." They should buy
cocaine with it and have a really big party or buy the world a Coke or
something. "Investment" in luxury freaking villas in the middle of
the godforsaken desert, or in superskyscrapers where there is not even
the semblance of an economy outside of "we sell oil and NG" is
idiotic. It's malinvestment, unsustainable, doomed. It does nothing
to further any useful technology.

What part of this do you not get?

Trav
Fraser Johnston...
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:22 pm
Guest
<travisgod at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:091d10a2-21c2-485f-97a5-2afbb5b35986 at (no spam) y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
The people fundinging these resorts are immensely wealthy, and will
continue to be immensely wealthy regardless of what happens, for years
to come. They have more money than they know what to do with, and no
real reason to expect that this will not continue to be the case.
Peak to them is irrelevant; they will still be selling oil, and at
higher and higher prices, for as long as there is demand.

Good lord, you are stupid...did you miss the entire point of
capitalism and investment?

WHAT people? Tommy fucking Lee? Who are they going to sell these
villas to? Who is going to lease space in the Burj? Or the other
dozen supertall buildings?

Quote:
See, this is your problem Trav. Your entire "expertise" on this
subject is what you Google on it. You don't understand the industry,
or even basic economics.

Who the fuck are you to tell anyone what they do and don't understand,
you frickin moron?

You have no expertise in this or any other topic, so STFU and go back
to the peanut gallery. If you want to take me on on what I know about
oil or economics, I am salivating, I really am.

Still waiting for that clip of your guitar playing. I'm not going to
hold my breath.

Quote:
These folks are not going to stop selling all the oil they camp pump
for decades to come. They might peak - they might even have peaked
already - it doesn't matter. They're still going to sell all they can
pump, at higher and higher prices. The only "insanity" here is you
trying to play the role of "expert" on something you barely
understand.

The only insanity here is your actually even thinking you can form
coherent sentences.

Dubai is the equivalent of Las Vegas or suburbia, you stupid fuck.
It's an investment in nothing. Why build houses on a fucking
artificial island? Nobody wants to live in Dubai. Why build gigantic
buildings with no occupants?

This is the DEFINITION of a WASTE, just like your posts on RMA.

Of course I know how these people funding these "ventures" can afford
to build these stupid, wasteful projects and that they will be rich so
long as there is oil to sell. Who the fuck DOESN'T know that? Do you
honestly think you have something new here to tell me? If you do, get
to it.

It's WASTED FUCKING MONEY, wasted "investment." They should buy
cocaine with it and have a really big party or buy the world a Coke or
something. "Investment" in luxury freaking villas in the middle of
the godforsaken desert, or in superskyscrapers where there is not even
the semblance of an economy outside of "we sell oil and NG" is
idiotic. It's malinvestment, unsustainable, doomed. It does nothing
to further any useful technology.

What part of this do you not get?

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You're wrong Trav. People are buying houses on Palm Island. Tiger Woods and
David Beckham are 2 that spring to mind. Dubai is a central hub which makes it
easy to get to anywhere in the world. Makes a good place to home base
yourself. Plus no crime and easy tax laws make it a no brainer.

Frsaer
...
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:51 pm
Guest
"Greendistantstar" <pde63539removethis at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote in
message news:oYg8k.14301$IK1.12716 at (no spam) news-server.bigpond.net.au...
Quote:

travisgod at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c798297-9e58-49b4-9217-e2068163ecda at (no spam) w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

: Sitting in the last stages
Surprisedf your little property bubble in AUS, thinking "it's different," you
::may just be a bit behind the curve. Keep telling yourself this is all
:"contained," to "subprime" or "the US."

Nope. What we see here is the moaning of the debtor. Some nations are making
a shitload of money out energy and resources, and some are paying out.

What the creditors do with their riches is their business. Our 'bubble' is
on the back of the best economic indicators in generations ie low
unemployment, low inflation, low interest rates, high commodity prices and
surging demand.


You have found a big customer for your mining industry - the
manufacturing powerhouse of China.



Quote:
If you're a smart nation, you'll realize that this won't
last forever and you invest trade surpluses productively ie reduce debt and
create infrastructure for the future.


Uncle Sam sure isn't smart; wasting all the money on military
misadventures, one after another.


Quote:
It's a changing of the guard, Trav.


Historians will have a field day judging the demise of a short-lived
"Super Power".
Greendistantstar...
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:12 pm
Guest
<travisgod at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:9c798297-9e58-49b4-9217-e2068163ecda at (no spam) w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

: Sitting in the last stages
Surprisedf your little property bubble in AUS, thinking "it's different," you
::may just be a bit behind the curve. Keep telling yourself this is all
:"contained," to "subprime" or "the US."

Nope. What we see here is the moaning of the debtor. Some nations are making
a shitload of money out energy and resources, and some are paying out.

What the creditors do with their riches is their business. Our 'bubble' is
on the back of the best economic indicators in generations ie low
unemployment, low inflation, low interest rates, high commodity prices and
surging demand. If you're a smart nation, you'll realize that this won't
last forever and you invest trade surpluses productively ie reduce debt and
create infrastructure for the future.

It's a changing of the guard, Trav.


GDS

"Let's roll!"
...
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:44 pm
Guest
"Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:xAA8k.
5720$Fj5.1479 at (no spam) newsfe23.lga...
Quote:
http://www.amazon.com/Empire-Lies-Truth-Twenty-First-Century/dp/1594032165





That book itself is a pack of lies (hence the title "Empire of Lies),
should have been put in the category of "Mindless Propaganda and Lies"
in the bookstore, merely for the sake of completeness.
Greendistantstar...
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:46 pm
Guest
<travisgod at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message
news:6415a06d-bf04-4103-b4e8-8b6ad1938e6f at (no spam) f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 24, 8:12 pm, "Greendistantstar"
<pde63539removet... at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote:
Quote:
travis... at (no spam) aol.com> wrote in message

news:9c798297-9e58-49b4-9217-e2068163ecda at (no spam) w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

: Sitting in the last stages
Surprisedf your little property bubble in AUS, thinking "it's different," you
::may just be a bit behind the curve. Keep telling yourself this is all
:"contained," to "subprime" or "the US."

Nope. What we see here is the moaning of the debtor. Some nations are
making
a shitload of money out energy and resources, and some are paying out.

What the creditors do with their riches is their business. Our 'bubble' is
on the back of the best economic indicators in generations ie low
unemployment, low inflation, low interest rates, high commodity prices and
surging demand. If you're a smart nation, you'll realize that this won't
last forever and you invest trade surpluses productively ie reduce debt
and
create infrastructure for the future.

It's a changing of the guard, Trav.

GDS

"Let's roll!"

:HAHAHAHAHAHA...you are so delusional it is absurd.

Still sticking by your prediction of US economic collapse in September?

:Things are different this time, LOL.

Different insofar as who wins and loses in the mediium term? You bet.

--
GDS

"Let's roll!"
...
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:28 pm
Guest
"Greendistantstar" <pde63539removethis at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote in
message news:wCY8k.15192$IK1.521 at (no spam) news-server.bigpond.net.au...
|
| <WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:
6791dc14-7bd4-469d-83e1-130be4b52444 at (no spam) y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
| :
| : "Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:uDu8k.
| : 8830$rH1.225 at (no spam) newsfe20.lga...
| : | Horse shit. China has huge problems. 200 million in the middle
class
| : and a
| : | billion still living in bone crushing poverty.
| :
| :
| : That's the beauty of it. Their prosperity has a lot of room to
grow.
| : They have nowhere to go but up. On the contrary, the U.S. has
| : "peaked", and has nowhere to go but down.
|
| There's the rub....the resource that enabled that growth in the US
has now
| likely peaked worldwide. It's the same resource that China needs to
grow.
|
| China's nominal GDP has been growing exponentially since the early
1950s,
| and it's economic growth rate has averaged about 9.% over the past
25 years.
|
| If it just *maintains* that growth, the Chinese economy will have
DOUBLED by
| 2015.
|
| The consequences of doubling we have already discussed, so suffice
to say,
| it either happens with an environment in ruins, or the growth halts
with
| monumental consequences for everyone.
|
|
|


You are calculating with the mindset that everything in the future is
the same as today. Don't forget that there were no such thing as
gasoline engine, electricity, or nuclear energy 100 years ago. People
are able to adapt to new reality.

If you are talking about energy without petroleum, the future will be
hydro-electricity (or solar/wind/tidal), hydrogen fuel-cells, and
nuclear energy.

Do you know why China insists on building the controversial "Three
Gorges" hydroelectric dam? The answer is: free energy.

Scientists have already figured out a way to bring about an
environmental chain reaction in Mars to transform Mars into a livable
planet much like the environment on Earth (I have read that article
many years ago in one of those science magazines, probably "Popular
Mechanics" or "Scientific American")

The idea is that we have to keep pushing progress and development to
guarantee our future as a viable species. Besides the possibility that
man-made (nuclear war) or natural disaster (global pandemic or meteor
collision) may wipe us out, we may not be the only intelligent life
form in the whole universe. We have to make sure we are advanced
enough to be able to negotiate on equal terms with any alien life
forms out there. Otherwise, our species may become their farm animals
for consumption, much like what we are doing to our cattle and sheep.



http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/space/3965730.html

HONG KONG — The survival of the human race depends on its ability to
find new homes elsewhere in the universe because there's an increasing
risk that a disaster will destroy Earth, world-renowned physicist
Stephen Hawking said today.

Humans could have a permanent base on the moon in 20 years and a
colony on Mars in the next 40 years, the British scientist told a news
conference.

"We won't find anywhere as nice as Earth unless we go to another star
system," added Hawking, who came to Hong Kong to a rock star's welcome
Monday. Tickets for his lecture Wednesday were sold out.

Hawking said that if humans can avoid killing themselves in the next
100 years, they should have space settlements that can continue
without support from Earth.

"It is important for the human race to spread out into space for the
survival of the species," Hawking said. "Life on Earth is at the ever-
increasing risk of being wiped out by a disaster, such as sudden
global warming, nuclear war, a genetically engineered virus or other
dangers we have not yet thought of."
...
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:40 pm
Guest
"Gernot Hassenpflug" <gernot at (no spam) nict.go.jp> wrote in message news:
87tzffzb0n.fsf at (no spam) nict.go.jp...
| >
| > Very Happyo you know why China insists on building the controversial
"Three
| > :Gorges" hydroelectric dam? The answer is: free energy.
|
| There is no free anything. It is a trade-off, whether it will be
| better or worse remains to be seen. I doubt the thinking went beyond
| stage one if it was a political decision...
|

The "Three Gorges Dam" is the largest hydro-electric power station in
the world. China is not a democracy. If the government decides it is
good for the country, it will be built. It is expected to be
operational in 2011.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Gorges_Dam

Hydro-electricity is free energy. The water from the dam pushes the
turbine instead of steam power from burning coal, petroleum or nuclear
reaction.



| I'm curious about something: if economics (efficient utilization of
| scarce resources) says that the price of *all* items that depend on
| one common input will go up if demand for even *one* of those items
| goes up, then is it inevitable that prices for everything will
always
| rise, since there will always be fashions of demands for some item
or
| other. The reason I ask is that I cannot see production of the
| underlying common input also goes up at no extra cost above the
| incremental cost of more production which is covered by the
increased
| sales at the same previous price [imagine that this process consists
| of many many stages, and that somewhere at the bottom is some
| fundamental input like petroleum, or some agricultural product]?
|


I cannot figure out what the hell you are trying to say, but I can
tell you that things are getting cheaper and cheaper in the stores
every year ever since everything becomes "Made in China".

You seem to think like GDS. You cannot get your mindset out of
petroleum when you think about energy. One simple solution I have in
this thread is hydrogen fuel-cells. Hydrogen can be obtained by
electrolysis of water using the electricity from hydro-electric dams,
and the hydrogen can either be burned directly in internal combustion
engines, or used in hydrogen fuel-cells to convert back to
electricity. In both cases, the by-product is pure water.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_vehicle
A hydrogen vehicle is a vehicle that uses hydrogen as its on-board
fuel for motive power. The term may refer to a personal transportation
vehicle, such as an automobile, or any other vehicle that uses
hydrogen in a similar fashion, such as an aircraft. The power plants
of such vehicles convert the chemical energy of hydrogen to mechanical
energy (torque) in one of two methods: combustion, or electrochemical
conversion in a fuel-cell:

In combustion, the hydrogen is burned in engines in fundamentally the
same method as traditional gasoline (petrol) cars.
In fuel-cell conversion, the hydrogen is reacted with oxygen to
produce water and electricity, the latter of which is used to power an
electric traction motor.
Herbert Cannon...
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:42 pm
Guest
<WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c77bfc35-f3dd-4bd7-b03d-2ebd31d29c7c at (no spam) l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Quote:

"Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:PMv8k.
4685$i55.1606 at (no spam) newsfe22.lga...
|
| <WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:
6791dc14-7bd4-469d-83e1-130be4b52444 at (no spam) y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
|
| > They are still reeling from Mao's "Great Leap Forward", but they
are
| > getting better.
|
| Horseshit. Mao has been dead for years.
|


Mao was such a great leader, his mistakes were, unfortunately, long
lasting too.

That is usually the case with tyrants.
Greendistantstar...
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:53 pm
Guest
<WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6791dc14-7bd4-469d-83e1-130be4b52444 at (no spam) y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
:
: "Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:uDu8k.
: 8830$rH1.225 at (no spam) newsfe20.lga...
: | Horse shit. China has huge problems. 200 million in the middle class
: and a
: | billion still living in bone crushing poverty.
:
:
: That's the beauty of it. Their prosperity has a lot of room to grow.
: They have nowhere to go but up. On the contrary, the U.S. has
: "peaked", and has nowhere to go but down.

There's the rub....the resource that enabled that growth in the US has now
likely peaked worldwide. It's the same resource that China needs to grow.

China's nominal GDP has been growing exponentially since the early 1950s,
and it's economic growth rate has averaged about 9.% over the past 25 years.

If it just *maintains* that growth, the Chinese economy will have DOUBLED by
2015.

The consequences of doubling we have already discussed, so suffice to say,
it either happens with an environment in ruins, or the growth halts with
monumental consequences for everyone.


--
GDS

"Let's roll!"
Greendistantstar...
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:15 am
Guest
<WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9b134296-0713-45f3-87af-dcd85f0e1cb6 at (no spam) k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

"Greendistantstar" <pde63539removethis at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote in
message news:wCY8k.15192$IK1.521 at (no spam) news-server.bigpond.net.au...
|
| <WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:
6791dc14-7bd4-469d-83e1-130be4b52444 at (no spam) y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
| :
| : "Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message
news:uDu8k.
| : 8830$rH1.225 at (no spam) newsfe20.lga...
| : | Horse shit. China has huge problems. 200 million in the
middle
class
| : and a
| : | billion still living in bone crushing poverty.
| :
| :
| : That's the beauty of it. Their prosperity has a lot of room to
grow.
| : They have nowhere to go but up. On the contrary, the U.S. has
| : "peaked", and has nowhere to go but down.
|
| There's the rub....the resource that enabled that growth in the
US
has now
| likely peaked worldwide. It's the same resource that China needs
to
grow.
|
| China's nominal GDP has been growing exponentially since the
early
1950s,
| and it's economic growth rate has averaged about 9.% over the
past
25 years.
|
| If it just *maintains* that growth, the Chinese economy will have
DOUBLED by
| 2015.
|
| The consequences of doubling we have already discussed, so
suffice
to say,
| it either happens with an environment in ruins, or the growth
halts
with
| monumental consequences for everyone.
|
|
|


:You are calculating with the mindset that everything in the future
is
:the same as today.

You mean that we'll discover an alternative to petroleum? Good luck
with that.

:Don't forget that there were no such thing as
:gasoline engine, electricity, or nuclear energy 100 years ago.
People
:are able to adapt to new reality.

The new reality won't be highways in the sky etc.

:If you are talking about energy without petroleum,

Partly, yes....

: the future will be
:hydro-electricity (or solar/wind/tidal),

Cannot possibly fill the void. What do you think is used to
manufacture all the bits and pieces of these things?

:hydrogen fuel-cells,

A capture-only technology and a net energy loser.

:and
::nuclear energy.

Which won't help a razoo.

:Do you know why China insists on building the controversial "Three
:Gorges" hydroelectric dam? The answer is: free energy.

This is just ONE ASPECT of energy production.

:Scientists have already figured out a way to bring about an
:environmental chain reaction in Mars to transform Mars into a
livable
:planet much like the environment on Earth (I have read that
article
:many years ago in one of those science magazines, probably
"Popular
:Mechanics" or "Scientific American")

The only terraforming going on right now is by the people with most
of the oil.

:The idea is that we have to keep pushing progress and development
to
:guarantee our future as a viable species. Besides the possibility
that
:man-made (nuclear war) or natural disaster (global pandemic or
meteor
:collision) may wipe us out, we may not be the only intelligent
life
:form in the whole universe. We have to make sure we are advanced
:enough to be able to negotiate on equal terms with any alien life
:forms out there. Otherwise, our species may become their farm
animals
:for consumption, much like what we are doing to our cattle and
sheep.

More likely we'll realize that we squandered our greatest resource
and we never achieve our fullest potential as a species.

Having a geomorphology that allowed petroleum to develop may well
be a very, very, very rare occurrence in the universe, at the very
least a necessary stepping stone to future technologies.

If you use it all up before you've got the replacement technology
and infrastructure in place, you never get to the next phase.

Perhaps the universe is littered with such failed species, who
never rose beyond their own small sphere of influence.


http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/space/3965730.html

HONG KONG — The survival of the human race depends on its ability
to
find new homes elsewhere in the universe because there's an
increasing
risk that a disaster will destroy Earth, world-renowned physicist
Stephen Hawking said today.

Read some Olaf Stapledon, Asimov or more recently, Tulane U's own
Prof Frank Tipler.


--
GDS

"Let's roll!"
Gernot Hassenpflug...
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:45 am
Guest
"Greendistantstar" <pde63539removethis at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> writes:

Quote:
WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9b134296-0713-45f3-87af-dcd85f0e1cb6 at (no spam) k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

"Greendistantstar" <pde63539removethis at (no spam) bigpond.net.au> wrote in
message news:wCY8k.15192$IK1.521 at (no spam) news-server.bigpond.net.au...
|
| <WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:
6791dc14-7bd4-469d-83e1-130be4b52444 at (no spam) y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com...
| :
| : "Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18 at (no spam) cox.net> wrote in message news:uDu8k.
| : 8830$rH1.225 at (no spam) newsfe20.lga...
| : | Horse shit. China has huge problems. 200 million in the middle
class
| : and a
| : | billion still living in bone crushing poverty.

Economically it means nothing to say that in isolation. What is
relevant to ask is what incentives and constraints act on them and how
that can affect their future economic situation.

Quote:
:You are calculating with the mindset that everything in the future is
:the same as today.

You mean that we'll discover an alternative to petroleum? Good luck
with that.

:Don't forget that there were no such thing as
:gasoline engine, electricity, or nuclear energy 100 years ago. People
:are able to adapt to new reality.

:Do you know why China insists on building the controversial "Three
:Gorges" hydroelectric dam? The answer is: free energy.

There is no free anything. It is a trade-off, whether it will be
better or worse remains to be seen. I doubt the thinking went beyond
stage one if it was a political decision...

I'm curious about something: if economics (efficient utilization of
scarce resources) says that the price of *all* items that depend on
one common input will go up if demand for even *one* of those items
goes up, then is it inevitable that prices for everything will always
rise, since there will always be fashions of demands for some item or
other. The reason I ask is that I cannot see production of the
underlying common input also goes up at no extra cost above the
incremental cost of more production which is covered by the increased
sales at the same previous price [imagine that this process consists
of many many stages, and that somewhere at the bottom is some
fundamental input like petroleum, or some agricultural product]?
--
BOFH excuse #391:

We already sent around a notice about that.
Greendistantstar...
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 11:05 pm
Guest
<WannabeSomeoneCares at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ab0c0ef4-c09a-4015-9109-e7c48dd74f66 at (no spam) 34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

Quote:
You seem to think like GDS. You cannot get your mindset out of
petroleum when you think about energy.

Dude, petroleum isn't just about energy.

Petroleum is a price-input into the manufacture/growth, transport
and distribution of almost every industrial, agricultural and
consumer product.

It's not so much the consequences of running out; more the impact
on the price of everything as the gap between supply and demand
broadens.

The worldwide inflationary impact is truly scary. With crude at
$400 per barrel, that box of cornflakes might cost $50.

Quote:
One simple solution I have in
this thread is hydrogen fuel-cells.

It looks promising until you dig down and realize it's a net energy
loser.

Biofuel, which has also been touted as a viable alternative, is now
seen to be a possible disaster in the making, creating a 'fuel vs
food' issue.

The cost of converting the existing fuel creation/delivery
infrastructure from gasoline to hydrogen or anything else is beyond
feasible.

It would require an industrial re-fit with no parallel in human
history, and would ironically require an hugely increased use of
petroleum to achieve it.

Extending the plateau by drastically reducing demand is the only
possible answer, and that hardly seems likely.

http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/

--
GDS

"Let's roll!"
 
Page 1 of 2    Goto page 1, 2  Next   All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:20 pm