| |
 |
|
|
Hobby Forum Index » Scuba » What is it? Egg casing of some sort
Page 1 of 1
|
| Author |
Message |
| Al Rudderham |
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 11:50 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
I was on the Nekton Pilot a couple weeks ago on their Cay Sal
itinerary. (It was a great trip.) At Orange Cay and several spots on
the Cay Sal Bank we saw a lot of large egg casings that nobody could
identify.
Being a trash collector, I picked up the first one I saw thinking it
was a piece of plastic. It was white, with ribs like the flexible
ducting for a clothes dryer. But on the bottom (which was resting on
the sand) it was flat, so it looked sort of like the cross-section of
spinal cord. It was about 6 inches long, and about 3 inches in
diameter. The ends were flat and they were closed over. I saw others
later in the week that were more biege than white.
I found the first one on the sand between two small coral heads. Most
of the other ones were in the open. There was no attachment, they
just drifted back and forth with the surge. Depth was mostly in the
15-25 foot range.
Any ideas?
--
Remove preceding and trailing X from username for replies
(Sorry, but I'm SICK of spam...) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mike gray |
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 4:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Al Rudderham wrote:
Quote: I was on the Nekton Pilot a couple weeks ago on their Cay Sal
itinerary. (It was a great trip.) At Orange Cay and several spots on
the Cay Sal Bank we saw a lot of large egg casings that nobody could
identify.
Being a trash collector, I picked up the first one I saw thinking it
was a piece of plastic. It was white, with ribs like the flexible
ducting for a clothes dryer. But on the bottom (which was resting on
the sand) it was flat, so it looked sort of like the cross-section of
spinal cord. It was about 6 inches long, and about 3 inches in
diameter. The ends were flat and they were closed over. I saw others
later in the week that were more biege than white.
I found the first one on the sand between two small coral heads. Most
of the other ones were in the open. There was no attachment, they
just drifted back and forth with the surge. Depth was mostly in the
15-25 foot range.
Sounds like whelk eggs, but the diameter is too big. Yer sure it was 3"? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Lee Bell |
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 8:09 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Quote: Al Rudderham wrote:
I was on the Nekton Pilot a couple weeks ago on their Cay Sal
itinerary. (It was a great trip.) At Orange Cay and several spots on
the Cay Sal Bank we saw a lot of large egg casings that nobody could
identify.
Being a trash collector, I picked up the first one I saw thinking it
was a piece of plastic. It was white, with ribs like the flexible
ducting for a clothes dryer. But on the bottom (which was resting on
the sand) it was flat, so it looked sort of like the cross-section of
spinal cord. It was about 6 inches long, and about 3 inches in
diameter. The ends were flat and they were closed over. I saw others
later in the week that were more biege than white.
I found the first one on the sand between two small coral heads. Most
of the other ones were in the open. There was no attachment, they
just drifted back and forth with the surge. Depth was mostly in the
15-25 foot range.
Sounds like whelk eggs, but the diameter is too big. Yer sure it was 3"?
I think Mike's on the right track, but I don't recall seeing any that are 3
inches in diameter either. Here's a link to a picture. Maybe it will help.
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~dwills/pictures/whelk1a.gif
Lee |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Al Rudderham |
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 3:51 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:24:51 GMT, mike gray <scrubadub@att.net> wrote:
Quote: Sounds like whelk eggs, but the diameter is too big. Yer sure it was 3"?
Maybe only 2 1/2", but certainly not significantly smaller than that.
I remember thinking it looked like a large plastic mug, and assumed it
was trash.
--
Remove preceding and trailing X from username for replies
(Sorry, but I'm SICK of spam...) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| Al Rudderham |
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 4:03 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 02:09:30 GMT, "Lee Bell"
<leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote:
There is a similarity, but the ones in the photo look thin and
delicate, and the thing I saw and held seemed to be fairly thick and
rigid. Also, these appear to have a "spinal cord" running down one
side, while I saw was that one side was flattened and without the
ribs.
I've done some more poking on Google, and it doesn't seem like any
whelk is large enough to lay eggs this size. It must have been
something BIG, or it must have hurt.
I wish now I had counted the number of "segments" in each of the
things I saw. At the time they all seemed to be the same length. And
I wish I'd taken the time to measure one, and to get somebody to send
me a photo. Nobody on board could figure out what they were, but
there were lots to spot. At the time I figured the answer would be
obvious when I got home and was able to search the web.
--
Remove preceding and trailing X from username for replies
(Sorry, but I'm SICK of spam...) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| mike gray |
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:05 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Al Rudderham wrote:
Quote: On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 02:09:30 GMT, "Lee Bell"
leebell@ix.remove.netcom.com> wrote:
I think Mike's on the right track, but I don't recall seeing any that are 3
inches in diameter either. Here's a link to a picture. Maybe it will help.
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~dwills/pictures/whelk1a.gif
There is a similarity, but the ones in the photo look thin and
delicate, and the thing I saw and held seemed to be fairly thick and
rigid. Also, these appear to have a "spinal cord" running down one
side, while I saw was that one side was flattened and without the
ribs.
I've done some more poking on Google, and it doesn't seem like any
whelk is large enough to lay eggs this size. It must have been
something BIG, or it must have hurt.
I wish now I had counted the number of "segments" in each of the
things I saw. At the time they all seemed to be the same length. And
I wish I'd taken the time to measure one, and to get somebody to send
me a photo. Nobody on board could figure out what they were, but
there were lots to spot. At the time I figured the answer would be
obvious when I got home and was able to search the web.
Aha! You were indeed looking at a fish backbone.
Maybe. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:16 pm
|
|