Main Page | Report this Page
.NET DotNet Forum Index  »  ADO .NET Forum  »  linq and SQL query...
Page 1 of 1    

linq and SQL query...

Author Message
Chris...
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:33 am
Guest
Imagine there is a DB table:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
1 B 11
1 C 12
2 D 13
2 E 14
2 F 15

How to write both sql and linq queries (I DONT want to use a subquery) to
get rows - min of col3 groupped by col1 BUT WITH col2:

the result should be:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
2 D 13
 
Patrice...
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 3:10 pm
Guest
"Chris" <Chris at (no spam) discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:3D4E87A8-1488-48F3-9BA2-59C8F17C3326 at (no spam) microsoft.com...
Quote:
Imagine there is a DB table:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
1 B 11
1 C 12
2 D 13
2 E 14
2 F 15

How to write both sql and linq queries (I DONT want to use a subquery) to
get rows - min of col3 groupped by col1 BUT WITH col2:

the result should be:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
2 D 13


And col2 is also the min value ? For now it looks to me you group by col1,
with the MIN aggregate function for both col2 and col 3 (i. just adding
MIN(col2) to your query would be enough)...

--
Patrice
 
go...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:01 am
Guest
In sql it should be something like (if col3 is id and you want first
record of col1)

select * from YOURTABLE a where col3 not in (select top 1 b.col3 from
YOURTABLE b where a.col1 = b.col1 and a.col2 = b.col2)

haven't tested it, but there's something to start with.

///M

Patrice skrev:
Quote:

"Chris" <Chris at (no spam) discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:3D4E87A8-1488-48F3-9BA2-59C8F17C3326 at (no spam) microsoft.com...
Imagine there is a DB table:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
1 B 11
1 C 12
2 D 13
2 E 14
2 F 15

How to write both sql and linq queries (I DONT want to use a subquery) to
get rows - min of col3 groupped by col1 BUT WITH col2:

the result should be:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
2 D 13


And col2 is also the min value ? For now it looks to me you group by
col1, with the MIN aggregate function for both col2 and col 3 (i. just
adding MIN(col2) to your query would be enough)...

--
Patrice
 
go...
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:19 am
Guest
well, it should be
select * from YOURTABLE a where col3 in (select top 1 b.col3 from
YOURTABLE b where a.col1 = b.col1)

sorry for the f**kup
///M

go skrev:
Quote:
In sql it should be something like (if col3 is id and you want first
record of col1)

select * from YOURTABLE a where col3 not in (select top 1 b.col3 from
YOURTABLE b where a.col1 = b.col1 and a.col2 = b.col2)

haven't tested it, but there's something to start with.

///M

Patrice skrev:

"Chris" <Chris at (no spam) discussions.microsoft.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:3D4E87A8-1488-48F3-9BA2-59C8F17C3326 at (no spam) microsoft.com...
Imagine there is a DB table:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
1 B 11
1 C 12
2 D 13
2 E 14
2 F 15

How to write both sql and linq queries (I DONT want to use a
subquery) to
get rows - min of col3 groupped by col1 BUT WITH col2:

the result should be:

col1 col2 col3
---------------------
1 A 10
2 D 13


And col2 is also the min value ? For now it looks to me you group by
col1, with the MIN aggregate function for both col2 and col 3 (i. just
adding MIN(col2) to your query would be enough)...

--
Patrice
 
 
Page 1 of 1    
All times are GMT - 5 Hours
The time now is Sun Dec 06, 2009 2:25 pm