| Computers Forum Index » Computer - DCOM - Cisco » Cisco 3020... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| jackwik at (no spam) gmail.com... |
 Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi All,
I am having an unusal problem whereby a new ESX is connected to an
existing blade center and when the port is enabled it goes to a down
state like it's physically not connected. The workaround I have found
is to reset the switch.
The version and the switch model is 12.2.44 (SE) WS-CBS3020-HPQ.
Thanks in advance for any help in resolving this issue.
Jack. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| jackwik at (no spam) gmail.com... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 1:14 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On Oct 26, 2:26 pm, Morph <morph.n... at (no spam) g.m.a.i.l> wrote:
Quote: In the message
13ff7389-3ff4-43fd-bedc-44a6e01ce... at (no spam) r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com
jack... at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
| Hi All,
|
| I am having an unusal problem whereby a new ESX is connected to an
| existing blade center and when the port is enabled it goes to a down
| state like it's physically not connected. The workaround I have found
| is to reset the switch.
| The version and the switch model is 12.2.44 (SE) WS-CBS3020-HPQ.
|
| Thanks in advance for any help in resolving this issue.
Is the port in err-disable status perhaps?http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note091...
That's the firet thing I checked.
Thanks anyway. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Morph... |
| Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:26 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
In the message
<13ff7389-3ff4-43fd-bedc-44a6e01ce07e at (no spam) r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
jackwik at (no spam) gmail.com wrote:
| Hi All,
|
| I am having an unusal problem whereby a new ESX is connected to an
| existing blade center and when the port is enabled it goes to a down
| state like it's physically not connected. The workaround I have found
| is to reset the switch.
| The version and the switch model is 12.2.44 (SE) WS-CBS3020-HPQ.
|
| Thanks in advance for any help in resolving this issue.
Is the port in err-disable status perhaps?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a00806cd87b.shtml |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
