$10 doesn't get you much these days... you can either buy 2 crippled C64
emulators for your phone... or you can use your phone to make phone calls
and buy a couple of pounds of fish for dinner with your $10...

Finally! The first retro computer emulator for iPhone, and unfortunately it
is not for Apple II!

The emulator is very well done - please take a look at the video!

If anybody kindly do an Apple II emulator I will buy it... and if it is an
Apple IIGS emulator I will give you my US$10.

I appreciate you posting this limtc.

A developer needs to make sure their emulator is fully licensed and
legal. The final Apple approved version of Manomio's [$4.99]
Commodore 64 emulator has BASIC disabled. I would assume that you may
want BASIC enabled on an Apple IIGS emulator.

Once you pay the US $10 for my crippled Apple II GS emulator for
iPhone, which Apple II GS game(s) would you want to purchase?

I appreciate you posting this limtc.

A developer needs to make sure their emulator is fully licensed and
legal. The final Apple approved version of Manomio's [$4.99]
Commodore 64 emulator has BASIC disabled. I would assume that you may
want BASIC enabled on an Apple IIGS emulator.

Once you pay the US $10 for my crippled Apple II GS emulator for
iPhone, which Apple II GS game(s) would you want to purchase?

..and to rag on this 64 emulator and call it crippled isn't totally
fair to it. It is what it is because thats what it took to release it.

On Sep 6, 2:23 am, A2Aviator <a2avia... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

..and to rag on this 64 emulator and call it crippled isn't totally
fair to it. It is what it is because thats what it took to release it.

Right. If people want to rag on someone about this, rag on Apple, for
making Microsoft look wide open and friendly.

(No, really. Microsoft has Windows Mobile in a Shared Source license,
and WinMo devices can usually run whatever apps you want, signed or
unsigned, without any jailbreaking. That only leaves the question
of... why isn't there an Apple II emulator that has been updated more
recently than 2001 for WinMo? The stuff out there now doesn't even
really run on a modern WinMo 6.1 device... I guess I could get
StyleTap and Appalm, but Appalm really isn't worth getting another
emulator for. It should be possible to port full-blown KEGS to this
thing, as long as you get past any graphical hurdles and Unicode/ASCII
hurdles (WinCE requires that all text be in Unicode.))

Finally! The first retro computer emulator for iPhone, and
unfortunately it is not for Apple II!

http://toucharcade.com/2009/09/05/c64-emulator-approved-by-apple-and-...

The emulator is very well done - please take a look at the video! If
anybody kindly do an Apple II emulator I will buy it... and if it is
an Apple IIGS emulator I will give you my US$10.

On Sep 5, 5:40 pm, limtc <thyech... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:

Finally! The first retro computer emulator for iPhone, and
unfortunately it is not for Apple II!

http://toucharcade.com/2009/09/05/c64-emulator-approved-by-apple-and-...

The emulator is very well done - please take a look at the video! If
anybody kindly do an Apple II emulator I will buy it... and if it is
an Apple IIGS emulator I will give you my US$10. :)

It's lame that you cannot download your own images to run.  It's not
impossible, e.g. the 41CX emulator (i41CX+) supports any module if it
is posted somewhere in a directory browseable URL--you just point to
it, download, and run.  Its up to the user to decided if they can run
that module, not Apple.

Apple does not police what websites I can visit or emails I can
download.  I see no reason not to have a download feature except that
the author wants to make extra $.  What if I want to run my own
programs?

It's lame that you cannot download your own images to run. It's not
impossible, e.g. the 41CX emulator (i41CX+) supports any module if it
is posted somewhere in a directory browseable URL--you just point to
it, download, and run. Its up to the user to decided if they can run
that module, not Apple.

On 9ÔÂ6ÈÕ, ÏÂÎç11ʱ27·Ö, datajerk <dataj... at (no spam) gmail..com> wrote:

It's lame that you cannot download your own images to run. It's not
impossible, e.g. the 41CX emulator (i41CX+) supports any module if it
is posted somewhere in a directory browseable URL--you just point to
it, download, and run. Its up to the user to decided if they can run
that module, not Apple.

This is against Apple SDK rule I think, not developer's fault.

makes this emulator unique is that everything is licensed, and you
don't need to download ROM somewhere.

What you are suggesting has
nothing to do with this software author

Now I think that maybe Apple II emulator might not be possible to be
released in App Store since I don't think Apple will ever licensed the
ROM to any other vendors.

We'll see. I have tentative plans to take a whack at an iPhone port of
Sweet16. Once I get the current code converted to Cocoa for Mac OS X,
I'm going to try an iPhone port. I know odds are against it making it
through Apple's screening process, but if nothing else, I'll have it
for my own use.

We'll see. I have tentative plans to take a whack at an iPhone port of
Sweet16. Once I get the current code converted to Cocoa for Mac OS X,
I'm going to try an iPhone port. I know odds are against it making it
through Apple's screening process, but if nothing else, I'll have it
for my own use.

Sheppy