On the other hand, since you use a nom de newsgroup that doesn't fully
identify you, your claims about yourself are supported only by your
claims, i.e., they're not supported.

In an attempt at setting the record straight, and to avoid the possibility
of any further misunderstanding, let me state that the arrogant,
condescending and rude initial reception that I received from so-called
professional DSP consultants is only the foundation of my outrage. My real
outrage is over the subsequent posts in which several of the regulars in
this newsgroup not only failed to object to the disgraceful conduct of
these so-called professional DSP consultants, but instead actually condoned
and encouraged it. The disgracefou conduct of these so-called professional
DSP consultants would never be tolerated in any accademic or work-relatied
environment. In fact, it wouldn't even be an issue with me if it were not
for the fact that in their posts these individuals are openly advertising
themselves as professional (implied) DSP consultants.

Jimmy J wrote:


In an attempt at setting the record straight, and to avoid the
possibility of any further misunderstanding, let me state that the
arrogant, condescending and rude initial reception that I received
from so-called professional DSP consultants is only the foundation of
my outrage. My real outrage is over the subsequent posts in which
several of the regulars in this newsgroup not only failed to object to
the disgraceful conduct of these so-called professional DSP
consultants, but instead actually condoned and encouraged it. The
disgracefou conduct of these so-called professional DSP consultants
would never be tolerated in any accademic or work-relatied
environment. In fact, it wouldn't even be an issue with me if it were
not for the fact that in their posts these individuals are openly
advertising themselves as professional (implied) DSP consultants.

Oh-Oh. eBob not dead:

"The blacklist database

http://www.netwood.net/~edwin/comp/dsp/blacklist.html

contains the names of people prone to posting personal attacks
and libelous remarks, using abusive or threatening rhetoric or
deceiving and manipulating subscribers to the comp.dsp newsgroup.
That is to say -- people prone to flaming, spamming and trolling.
New subscribers and other people who read comp.dsp infrequently
are encouraged to consult the blacklist database before responding
to any posting in the comp.dsp newsgroup. Responding to anyone
on the blacklist could have very unpleasant consequences."

On 25 Sep, 21:47, "Jimmy J." <s... at (no spam) spam.com> wrote:
Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos... at (no spam) nowhere.com> wrote
innews:jcednZ_xlOpfSiHXnZ
2dnUVZ_oednZ2d at (no spam) giganews.com:

JJ is either frustrated stupident looking for
homework or a madman obsessed with genious idea.

Or someone who was handed a real-world problem looking for a creative
solution.  Thanks to you and other arrogant assholes in this
newsgroup,
I
certainly know where the solution, creative or otherwise, is not
likely t
o
be found.

Good! At last it seems that what we told you from the start,
have begun to sink in.

You say you were "handed" the task - I understand that somebody
else asked you to find a solution to the problem I no longer
remember the details of.

I think this is the problem - somebody entrusted you with a
task you found out the hard way could not be solved. I can
understand the frustration of making such a discovery, but
please, do take that up with whoever assigned the task to you.

Next, it might be in your own best interest to find a different
job or project. You are just not cut out for whatever it is you
attempt to do right now.

Rune

On 9/25/2009 3:48 PM, Jimmy J wrote:
Richard Dobson<richarddobson at (no spam) blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
news:7c9vm.181253 $tD4.165830 at (no spam) newsfe07.ams2:

Jimmy J wrote:
.

Experience also tells that this place is not so good for looking
for a DSP consultant.
Perhaps logic might have told you that earlier and saved all the
aggro. As someone said here not so long ago "nobody gives away the
good stuff for free". It's primarily a place to, um, discuss, not
buy and sell (except in the minds of spammers). A few regulars who
are manufacturers do mention their products, most unobtrusively (in
the form of "we have this, contact us privately if you are
interested"), but nobody would expect any discussions or
negotiations to take place over a usenet list!
It seems to me that the normal course of action to find a
consultant
is to use one's existing list of contacts (people who know people
who know people); check out the known companies (and indeed academic
institutions) in the area, the odd trade show or conference, and so
forth. And make private confidential inquiries of individuals etc.
Find someone to have a beer with. I would have thought as a matter
of principle that usenet is the ~last~ place to look, rather than
the first. I do not recall you announcing yourself as a potential
employer until well after the subject of this thread had totally
evaporated.

Of course if you are sufficiently isolated as to not actually have
any industry or other contacts, you have a much harder job ahead
than anything which can be solved via usenet!

Richard Dobson


I could write a dissertation in response to your reply and still not
scratch the surfaces of the numerous issues that you raised. As a
sensible alternative, let me simply say that while I agree in very
general terms with much of what you have said, when it comes to the
specifics, I disagree with most of what you have said.

In an attempt at setting the record straight, and to avoid the
possibility of any further misunderstanding, let me state that the
arrogant, condescending and rude initial reception that I received
from so-called professional DSP consultants is only the foundation of
my outrage. My real outrage is over the subsequent posts in which
several of the regulars in this newsgroup not only failed to object
to the disgraceful conduct of these so-called professional DSP
consultants, but instead actually condoned and encouraged it.

And yet you keep coming back.

The disgracefou conduct of these so-called professional
DSP consultants would never be tolerated in any accademic or
work-relatied environment.

From this I get the impression that you've never really worked
anywhere.

In fact, it wouldn't even be an issue with me if it were not
for the fact that in their posts these individuals are openly
advertising themselves as professional (implied) DSP consultants.

Evidently you're very easily perturbed. I suspect any time you spend
in the workforce will be quite aggravating for you.

On 9/25/2009 4:21 PM, Jimmy J wrote:
Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen at (no spam) ieee.org> wrote in
news:XS9vm.7$kC.5 at (no spam) newsfe11.iad:

On 9/25/2009 12:32 PM, Jimmy J wrote:
Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen at (no spam) ieee.org> wrote in
news:0f4vm.107127$Y83.65735 at (no spam) newsfe21.iad:

I've not seen any evidence that he's in a position to hire anyone,
anyway. It seems to me he wields the "I wouldn't hire you" stick
merely as a way to try to exert some influence. I suspect he's a
student somewhere.

Wrong on all three counts....quite an accomplishment.
Congratulations. Obviously the IEEE has either significantly
lowered its standards in recent years, or has abandoned them
altogether.
There's no evidence that I'm wrong about anything. There's plenty
of evidence that you not only have no $$ to apply to the problem,

Claims of evidence don't constitute evidence. Put your so-called
evidence on the table or put a sipper on your big mouth.

You've already provided plenty of evidence that you're unlikely to be
in the position you claim to be, and continue to do so with every
post.

Meanwhile, if you want to be believed, you might provide some
evidence to back up your claims of genuinely seeking to spend money on
consultants.

Since the folks you're berating here appear under their
own names and can be researched, it's easy for just about anybody to
figure out whether your accusations with regards to competence are
accurate (which they're not).

On the other hand, since you use a nom de newsgroup that doesn't fully
identify you, your claims about yourself are supported only by your
claims, i.e., they're not supported.

Time for a reality check, moron? If I had all of the requisite DSP
skills, I wouldn't have come here for help/advice in the first place.
As for your mindless, idiotic and totally baseless allegation, this
isn't the first problem that I have managed/solved and it certainly
won't be the last one.

So you've solved it?

BTW, your scary discernment skills have failed to recognize that a
lot of the genuine DSP practicioners here are likely to be IEEE
members. There isn't any particular skill test to become an IEEE
member much beyond the ability to pay the dues, so your assessment
of the presence or absence of IEEE membership standards just reveals
that you don't have much of an idea about the industry at all.

Quite the contrary. The implication was that the quality of IEEE
members has clearly taken a noisedive into the toilet. Sorry you
missed the point.

No, the point was that pretty much anybody with a connection to the
industry can join the IEEE, so membership in IEEE makes no statement
whatsoever as to the quality or competence of the individual.

You're not really fooling anybody. You are, however, entertaining
some of us quite a bit.


Take a look in the mirror, moron, because not only are you a willing
participant in providing the entertainment to which you refer, the
laugh is actually on you.

I'm definitely a willing participant. Clearly so. Things are just
fine over here.

Keep at it, though. Eventually your berating of the experts whose
help you seek w pay off. I'm sure of it. It's a time-proven
technique.


It already has...and in spades. If I accidentally find myself
driving down a street that is full of pot holes, I get off that
street and take another route to my destination.

Then why do you keep coming back here if you dislike it so much?

Please take your own advice.

I also bet that someday when a manager fails to give you a big
enough
raise that you can correct the situation by letting him know how
incompetent he is for not recognizing your genius.

My advice to an obvious mental retard like you is to stay away from
from the horse races, the lotteries and the casinos.

Do you think that's where the smart people go?

Time and money, and not the opinions of arrogant assholes like you, will
be the judge of whether or not the problem with which I have been
entrusted can be solved, and whether or not I am cut out for whatever it
is that I am attempting to do right now.

Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:
Oh-Oh. eBob not dead:
"The blacklist database
http://www.netwood.net/~edwin/comp/dsp/blacklist.html

contains the names of people prone to posting personal attacks
and libelous remarks, using abusive or threatening rhetoric or
deceiving and manipulating subscribers to the comp.dsp newsgroup.
That is to say -- people prone to flaming, spamming and trolling.
New subscribers and other people who read comp.dsp infrequently
are encouraged to consult the blacklist database before responding
to any posting in the comp.dsp newsgroup. Responding to anyone
on the blacklist could have very unpleasant consequences."


Too bad that page isn't freely available any more.
Jerry

Jimmy J wrote:
.

Time and money, and not the opinions of arrogant assholes like you,
will be the judge of whether or not the problem with which I have
been entrusted can be solved, and whether or not I am cut out for
whatever it is that I am attempting to do right now.


But what ~is~ your problem?

("dsp_questions" or mariusfrielink at (no spam) gmail.com) under a new name, the
presenting problem (the subject of this thread) was his; he got some
helpful replies, and has since gone silent (understandably!), very
likely solving his problem with the help of a dsp consultant as
recommended here.

You haven't actually raised a dsp problem of your
own at all (other than to say you know nothing about dsp - with which
everyone here is more than happy to agree).

You now say you have been
"entrusted" (presumably in some way different from "contracted") with
a problem; but that remains undefined. Perhaps if you could actually
outline it, answers might be forthcoming.

On 27 Sep, 02:47, Jimmy J <s... at (no spam) spam.com> wrote:
You can put Vladimir
Vassilevsky and Rune Allnor at the top of that list.

At last some recognition!

eBob was a bit before my time, but now I am at the top
(alone?) on Uncle $$$' list, and #2 on JJ's list.

I am honored!

Rune

Hello,

My goal is to make a 16 channel fixed RFID reader with DSP. But I don't
really know what controller to use. I will be using the ISO 11785
standard. The HDX transponder uses FSK modulation, 124.2 kHz is logical
"1" and 134.2 kHz is logical "0". Questions are how fast do I want the
cpu to be, do need a fpu? etc. I need a 16 channel ADC, so preferably a
controller instead of a processor.
If you need more info, please ask me.

Is there anyone out there who can help me choose the right one?

Thank you,

On 9/26/2009 5:24 PM, Jimmy J wrote:
Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen at (no spam) ieee.org> wrote in
news:Tghvm.629$bP1.571 at (no spam) newsfe24.iad:

On 9/25/2009 4:21 PM, Jimmy J wrote:
Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen at (no spam) ieee.org> wrote in
news:XS9vm.7$kC.5 at (no spam) newsfe11.iad:

On 9/25/2009 12:32 PM, Jimmy J wrote:
Eric Jacobsen<eric.jacobsen at (no spam) ieee.org> wrote in
news:0f4vm.107127$Y83.65735 at (no spam) newsfe21.iad:

I've not seen any evidence that he's in a position to hire
anyone, anyway. It seems to me he wields the "I wouldn't hire
you" stick merely as a way to try to exert some influence. I
suspect he's a student somewhere.
Wrong on all three counts....quite an accomplishment.
Congratulations. Obviously the IEEE has either significantly
lowered its standards in recent years, or has abandoned them
altogether.
There's no evidence that I'm wrong about anything. There's
plenty of evidence that you not only have no $$ to apply to the
problem,
Claims of evidence don't constitute evidence. Put your so-called
evidence on the table or put a sipper on your big mouth.
You've already provided plenty of evidence that you're unlikely to
be in the position you claim to be, and continue to do so with every
post.


You continue to assert the existence of so-called evicence, but at
the same time, you repeatedly refuse to put the evidence to which you
refer on the table for discussion.

Because it's already here. Your posts are the evidence.

Meanwhile, if you want to be believed, you might provide some
evidence to back up your claims of genuinely seeking to spend money
on consultants.


What sort of "eveidence" would you consider acceptable?

What have you got?

Maybe you didn't understand your own allegory.

Vladimir Vassilevsky<nospam at (no spam) nowhere.com> wrote in
news:raqdnavQcrEumlzXnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d at (no spam) giganews.com:


Al Clark wrote:

Vladimir, perhaps you would like to host one? I would come.

Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing
Guys,

It would be great to see you at my place. Kansas City is good location
because it is not too far from anywhere in US. We have nice weather now
and some entertainment will be available. Please let me know if you
would like to come and/or make a presentation; I'll put together a list
and post it at my web site.
Everybody is welcome, if you would like to talk as engineer to engineer.
The approximate time could be in mid. October.
The contact email is at the web site.


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com


Hi Vladimir,

I'm not sure about other conflicts, but AES (Audio Engineering Society) is
from Oct 9 thru Oct 12 in NYC. I know rbj and I will be there.

Maybe late October?

Al

Al Clark wrote:


Vladimir, perhaps you would like to host one? I would come.

Al Clark
Danville Signal Processing

Guys,

It would be great to see you at my place. Kansas City is good location
because it is not too far from anywhere in US. We have nice weather now
and some entertainment will be available. Please let me know if you
would like to come and/or make a presentation; I'll put together a list
and post it at my web site.
Everybody is welcome, if you would like to talk as engineer to engineer.
The approximate time could be in mid. October.
The contact email is at the web site.


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com

Earlier today (at 8:33 PM you wrote, "I promise that I won't ever come
here again seeking either information or advice."

By 9:00 you already broke that promise.

that I won't ever come here again!"