 |
|
| Computers Forum Index » Computer Languages (Smalltalk) » a suggestion to Cincom Smalltalk... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| Emptist... |
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 1:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi,
I have a suggestion for Cincom Smalltalk for attracting new users.
Cincom Smalltalk, as many other dialects, has non-commercial versions.
But for new comer who never has touched a Smalltalk IDE it's too huge
a download and this may prevent them from giving it a first try. Even
Object Studio now becomes more than 190 mb large.
My suggestion is that Cincom Smalltalk guys may work out some
smalltalk one-click version but for common develop purpose (not
Seaside only like your WV), which bring with it the lesson browser and
those introduction workspaces. Better include in it links to some
video that James has been doing.
In fact when I recommend VW to my friends I often use the SeaBreeze
one-click which is arround some 30 mb to download but the problem is
it is for Seaside and not from Cincom.
Thanks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| jarober... |
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:24 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
This is a worthwhile idea, but it's not without issues. What should
be pre-loaded into such an image? What should happen when you pop up
the Parcel Manager and the component(s) you want to load are not
present?
On Aug 18, 9:12 am, Emptist <jimg1... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Hi,
I have a suggestion for Cincom Smalltalk for attracting new users.
Cincom Smalltalk, as many other dialects, has non-commercial versions.
But for new comer who never has touched a Smalltalk IDE it's too huge
a download and this may prevent them from giving it a first try. Even
Object Studio now becomes more than 190 mb large.
My suggestion is that Cincom Smalltalk guys may work out some
smalltalk one-click version but for common develop purpose (not
Seaside only like your WV), which bring with it the lesson browser and
those introduction workspaces. Better include in it links to some
video that James has been doing.
In fact when I recommend VW to my friends I often use the SeaBreeze
one-click which is arround some 30 mb to download but the problem is
it is for Seaside and not from Cincom.
Thanks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| jarober... |
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 10:38 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Not that it's a huge addition, but note that including Web Services
requires NetClients. I'd also point out that not including DLLCC (for
calling out to C code) would likely be a mistake.
This kind of thing is not simple...
On Aug 19, 5:37 am, "Steven Kelly" <ste... at (no spam) metacase.com> wrote:
Quote: The NetInstaller is the right approach, but a "typical install" is 570MB.http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/scripts/DownloadInstaller.ssp
My choice of basic functionality, taking size into account, would be:
Advanced Tools 1MB
Base VW 123MB
Database 4MB
Opentalk 3.4MB
Store 5.9MB
Web Services 4.5MB
VM (Windows 16MB)
Total 158MB
I've not included anything from Contributed: most of the Contributed things
chosen in the current "typical" install would seem to make little sense to
most users. The main Contributed package has good stuff in, but at 60MB
there's also a lot that's unnecessary.
I'd probably make a separate "web server development" installation option,
or maybe that role is now fulfilled by WebVelocity.
Steve
"jarober" <jaro... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:79a13a36-deac-4e32-9668-3d456aff3654 at (no spam) z31g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
This is a worthwhile idea, but it's not without issues. What should
be pre-loaded into such an image? What should happen when you pop up
the Parcel Manager and the component(s) you want to load are not
present?
On Aug 18, 9:12 am, Emptist <jimg1... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I have a suggestion for Cincom Smalltalk for attracting new users.
Cincom Smalltalk, as many other dialects, has non-commercial versions.
But for new comer who never has touched a Smalltalk IDE it's too huge
a download and this may prevent them from giving it a first try. Even
Object Studio now becomes more than 190 mb large.
My suggestion is that Cincom Smalltalk guys may work out some
smalltalk one-click version but for common develop purpose (not
Seaside only like your WV), which bring with it the lesson browser and
those introduction workspaces. Better include in it links to some
video that James has been doing.
In fact when I recommend VW to my friends I often use the SeaBreeze
one-click which is arround some 30 mb to download but the problem is
it is for Seaside and not from Cincom.
Thanks.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Steven Kelly... |
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:37 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The NetInstaller is the right approach, but a "typical install" is 570MB.
http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/scripts/DownloadInstaller.ssp
My choice of basic functionality, taking size into account, would be:
Advanced Tools 1MB
Base VW 123MB
Database 4MB
Opentalk 3.4MB
Store 5.9MB
Web Services 4.5MB
VM (Windows 16MB)
Total 158MB
I've not included anything from Contributed: most of the Contributed things
chosen in the current "typical" install would seem to make little sense to
most users. The main Contributed package has good stuff in, but at 60MB
there's also a lot that's unnecessary.
I'd probably make a separate "web server development" installation option,
or maybe that role is now fulfilled by WebVelocity.
Steve
"jarober" <jarober at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:79a13a36-deac-4e32-9668-3d456aff3654 at (no spam) z31g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
This is a worthwhile idea, but it's not without issues. What should
be pre-loaded into such an image? What should happen when you pop up
the Parcel Manager and the component(s) you want to load are not
present?
On Aug 18, 9:12 am, Emptist <jimg1... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Hi,
I have a suggestion for Cincom Smalltalk for attracting new users.
Cincom Smalltalk, as many other dialects, has non-commercial versions.
But for new comer who never has touched a Smalltalk IDE it's too huge
a download and this may prevent them from giving it a first try. Even
Object Studio now becomes more than 190 mb large.
My suggestion is that Cincom Smalltalk guys may work out some
smalltalk one-click version but for common develop purpose (not
Seaside only like your WV), which bring with it the lesson browser and
those introduction workspaces. Better include in it links to some
video that James has been doing.
In fact when I recommend VW to my friends I often use the SeaBreeze
one-click which is arround some 30 mb to download but the problem is
it is for Seaside and not from Cincom.
Thanks. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| claus.kick at (no spam) googlemail.com... |
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 7:56 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
On 19 Aug., 12:38, jarober <jaro... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Quote: Not that it's a huge addition, but note that including Web Services
requires NetClients. I'd also point out that not including DLLCC (for
calling out to C code) would likely be a mistake.
What does anyone need DLLCC for if he/she wants to have a
look at CST and play around a bit with Seaside and the like? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| jarober... |
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2009 12:32 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
The problem is that it's an open question - what does anyone need if
they just want to investigate? There's no generically correct answer
to that question...
On Aug 20, 3:56 am, "claus.k... at (no spam) googlemail.com"
<claus.k... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:
Quote: On 19 Aug., 12:38, jarober <jaro... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Not that it's a huge addition, but note that including Web Services
requires NetClients. I'd also point out that not including DLLCC (for
calling out to C code) would likely be a mistake.
What does anyone need DLLCC for if he/she wants to have a
look at CST and play around a bit with Seaside and the like? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Steven Kelly... |
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2009 12:41 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Nobody is suggesting there is one answer that is right for everybody. I
think the point is that Cincom already offers one answer for a "Typical
Installation": 570MB. We're trying to help tune that answer closer to what
an average downloader will want in terms of size and functionality. Why not
do one of your surveys to ask which components should be checked? You could
list the installation components, their sizes and prerequisites, with a
checkbox for each.
There is no separate choice for Net Clients; I'd assume it is in the 123MB
base or maybe in Opentalk. Choosing Web Services doesn't tell you to choose
any package as a prerequisite.
I deliberately left out the low-level, platform-specific or obsolescent
integration mechanisms: DLLCC, COM, DotNetConnect, DST, Plugin. Including
WebServices is a judgement call; I think it's perhaps more likely to be used
or perceived as necessary in new projects and by non-Smalltalkers.
Steve
"jarober" <jarober at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote in message
news:73434b2e-4f19-4ace-8b9b-7335c911627b at (no spam) u38g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
The problem is that it's an open question - what does anyone need if
they just want to investigate? There's no generically correct answer
to that question...
On Aug 20, 3:56 am, "claus.k... at (no spam) googlemail.com"
<claus.k... at (no spam) googlemail.com> wrote:
Quote: On 19 Aug., 12:38, jarober <jaro... at (no spam) gmail.com> wrote:
Not that it's a huge addition, but note that including Web Services
requires NetClients. I'd also point out that not including DLLCC (for
calling out to C code) would likely be a mistake.
What does anyone need DLLCC for if he/she wants to have a
look at CST and play around a bit with Seaside and the like? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Cesar Rabak... |
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2009 12:43 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Steven Kelly escreveu:
Quote: Nobody is suggesting there is one answer that is right for everybody. I
think the point is that Cincom already offers one answer for a "Typical
Installation": 570MB. We're trying to help tune that answer closer to what
an average downloader will want in terms of size and functionality. Why not
do one of your surveys to ask which components should be checked? You could
list the installation components, their sizes and prerequisites, with a
checkbox for each.
As smart it may sound, this suggestion has the shortcoming that will
capture opinions from persons who already downloaded or already know VW,
while IIUC the answers we're after are what prospective users would want.
--
Cesar Rabak
GNU/Linux User 52247.
Get counted: http://counter.li.org/ |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Steven Kelly... |
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:49 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
"Cesar Rabak" <csrabak at (no spam) bol.com.br> wrote in message
news:h6n0ug$laq$1 at (no spam) news.eternal-september.org...
Quote: Steven Kelly escreveu:
Why not do one of your surveys to ask which components should be checked?
You could list the installation components, their sizes
and prerequisites, with a checkbox for each.
As smart it may sound, this suggestion has the shortcoming that will
capture opinions from persons who already downloaded or already know VW,
while IIUC the answers we're after are what prospective users would want.
Of course. But as smart as it may sound , asking prospective users has
the problem that a) we have no real channel to reach them to get their
answers [except the obvious one - see below], and b) they don't know what's
in VW. We're asking what would be good for prospective users, not what they
would want. They can already answer the latter question themselves by doing
a custom install; the "Typical Install" is designed for people who can't or
don't want to answer the more detailed questions.
One source of info that may be worth including is the download stats for the
various components. Again, there is no absolute truth to be found, and the
answers must be cross-referenced against the current "Typical Install"
choices (otherwise I suspect we'll just find that the majority download
exactly those choices).
Cheers,
Steve |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Thomas Gagne... |
Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:08 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
jarober wrote:
Quote: This is a worthwhile idea, but it's not without issues. What should
be pre-loaded into such an image? What should happen when you pop up
the Parcel Manager and the component(s) you want to load are not
present?
Handle it like some of the Linux distribution do--download pacakges on
by-request basis. Load the inventory of everything, then as people try
loading the parcel give it the ability to download and install. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT
The time now is Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:57 pm
|
|