| Computers Forum Index » Computer - Emulators (Misc) » Makefile for MAME (Fedora 10)... |
|
Page 1 of 1 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| asdasdas... |
 Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:12 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Hi,
Can someone post a Makefile for MAME for the Fedora 10 Linux operating
system?
Thanks if anyone can help!
--
http://mamedev.org |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dan Espen... |
| Posted: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:13 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Quote: Hi,
Can someone post a Makefile for MAME for the Fedora 10 Linux operating
system?
Thanks if anyone can help!
Looks to me like you'd be better off with sdlmame.
Yum should be able to install a pre-built binary.
Worked for me on FC8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| asdasdas... |
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:15 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
What is better/different about "SDL" MAME?
Dan Espen wrote:
Quote: asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Hi,
Can someone post a Makefile for MAME for the Fedora 10 Linux operating
system?
Thanks if anyone can help!
Looks to me like you'd be better off with sdlmame.
Yum should be able to install a pre-built binary.
Worked for me on FC8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| White Spirit... |
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:00 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
asdasdas wrote:
Quote: What is better/different about "SDL" MAME?
It's different/better in that it uses the SDL libraries for graphics and
sound instead of the X libraries and OSS. It has superseded xmame,
which is no longer being developed. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Dan Espen... |
| Posted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:43 pm |
|
|
|
Guest
|
asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Quote: Dan Espen wrote:
asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Hi,
Can someone post a Makefile for MAME for the Fedora 10 Linux operating
system?
Thanks if anyone can help!
Looks to me like you'd be better off with sdlmame.
Yum should be able to install a pre-built binary.
Worked for me on FC8.
What is better/different about "SDL" MAME?
I didn't actually use either.
I first looked at the state of the makefiles in mame
and it looked pathetic and un-maintained.
Then I found SDL-mame. Given the vintage of the original
mame, an SDL based mame has to be more modern and it's going
to be more compatible with what you are using.
The fact that I could install a pre-built binary seemed like a
compelling reason to use SDL-mame.
Take your pick, old, unsupported, can't compile
vs.
recent, available, pre-compiled. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| asdasdas... |
| Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:47 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
Where can I get a pre-built binary for fedora 10?
Dan Espen wrote:
Quote: asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Dan Espen wrote:
asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Hi,
Can someone post a Makefile for MAME for the Fedora 10 Linux operating
system?
Thanks if anyone can help!
Looks to me like you'd be better off with sdlmame.
Yum should be able to install a pre-built binary.
Worked for me on FC8.
What is better/different about "SDL" MAME?
I didn't actually use either.
I first looked at the state of the makefiles in mame
and it looked pathetic and un-maintained.
Then I found SDL-mame. Given the vintage of the original
mame, an SDL based mame has to be more modern and it's going
to be more compatible with what you are using.
The fact that I could install a pre-built binary seemed like a
compelling reason to use SDL-mame.
Take your pick, old, unsupported, can't compile
vs.
recent, available, pre-compiled. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
| Alister... |
| Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 12:08 am |
|
|
|
Guest
|
yasdasdas wrote:
Quote: Where can I get a pre-built binary for fedora 10?
Dan Espen wrote:
asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Dan Espen wrote:
asdasdas <dsfsdff at (no spam) sdfsdf.com> writes:
Hi,
Can someone post a Makefile for MAME for the Fedora 10 Linux operating
system?
Thanks if anyone can help!
Looks to me like you'd be better off with sdlmame.
Yum should be able to install a pre-built binary.
Worked for me on FC8.
What is better/different about "SDL" MAME?
I didn't actually use either.
I first looked at the state of the makefiles in mame
and it looked pathetic and un-maintained.
Then I found SDL-mame. Given the vintage of the original
mame, an SDL based mame has to be more modern and it's going
to be more compatible with what you are using.
The fact that I could install a pre-built binary seemed like a
compelling reason to use SDL-mame.
Take your pick, old, unsupported, can't compile
vs.
recent, available, pre-compiled.
yum install sdlmame |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
